Telegram CEO says French fees towards him are ‘erroneous’ — learn his complete observation
Pavel Durov, leading govt officer of Telegram, on the Cellular Global Congress in Barcelona, Spain, on Tuesday, Feb. 23, 2016.
Chris Ratcliffe | Bloomberg | Getty Photographs
The boss of messaging platform Telegram stated overdue Thursday that fees towards him by means of France are “misguided,” in his first community feedback since being detained within the nation just about two weeks in the past.
Pavel Durov, who based Telegram in 2013, was once last week charged with enabling criminality at the messaging app — together with dissemination of kid pornography, drug trafficking, and fraud, and refusal to proportion knowledge with government.
One of the crucial fees — complicity within the management of a web based platform to allow a bootleg transaction in an arranged gang — carries a most penalty of 10 years’ imprisonment and a 500,000 euro ($555,833) nice if any individual is located in charge upcoming trial.
Durov, who has been in France since his arrest on Aug. 24, posted a 5 million euro bail and remainder below judicial supervision. He can not drop French field and has to document two times weekly to a police station, prosecutors stated utmost pace.
In his first community feedback at the condition, Durov stated Thursday that France’s determination to detain and price him was once in keeping with a “misguided approach.
“If a rustic is sad with an web carrier, the established follow is to begin a criminal motion towards the carrier itself,” Telegram’s CEO and founder said in a statement posted on his Telegram account.
“The usage of rules from the pre-smartphone presen to price a CEO with crimes dedicated by means of 3rd events at the platform he manages is a erroneous method.”
“Development era is parched plethora as it’s. Refuse innovator will ever form unutilized equipment in the event that they know they are able to be in my view held answerable for possible abuse of the ones equipment,” he added.
Durov said that he was interviewed by French police for four days after arriving in Paris from Baku, the capital of Azerbaijan, last month.
“I used to be informed I could also be in my view answerable for alternative nation’s unlawful significance of Telegram, for the reason that French government didn’t obtain responses from Telegram,” he said, adding this was “sudden” as Telegram has an official representative in the EU that accepts and replies to requests.
The social media platform had already been working with French authorities to “identify a hotline with Telegram to trade in with with the blackmail of terrorism in France,” its founder said. Durov, a citizen of the United Arab Emirates, added that he was a “pervasive visitor on the French consulate in Dubai.”
Prior to Durov’s arrival in France, there was speculation that he was due to meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Azerbaijan.
However, the Kremlin’s official spokesperson told the BBC last week that a meeting never took place.
The 39-year-old Russian-born billionaire has a net worth of about $15.5 billion, according to Forbes, making him the world’s 121st wealthiest person.
Telegram, the platform he co-founded, has been often marketed as an uncensored and neutral platform.
But this approach has courted controversy for the app, with numerous governments raising concerns that Telegram lacks sufficient content moderation controls to detect and remove illegal content.
Telegram is particularly popular in repressive regimes where usage of internet platforms is heavily restricted. It has also gained a reputation for being used by fraud gangs, drug dealers, and even designated terrorist organizations, which have previously used the service to claim responsibility for attacks.
For its part, Telegram has defended its moderation practices, saying last week that they were “inside of trade requirements and continuously making improvements to.”
Thanks everyone for your support and love!
Last month I got interviewed by police for 4 days after arriving in Paris. I was told I may be personally responsible for other people’s illegal use of Telegram, because the French authorities didn’t receive responses from Telegram.This was surprising for several reasons:
- Telegram has an official representative in the EU that accepts and replies to EU requests. Its email address has been publicly available for anyone in the EU who googles “Telegram EU deal with for legislation enforcement”.
- The French authorities had numerous ways to reach me to request assistance. As a French citizen, I was a frequent guest at the French consulate in Dubai. A while ago, when asked, I personally helped them establish a hotline with Telegram to deal with the threat of terrorism in France.
- If a country is unhappy with an internet service, the established practice is to start a legal action against the service itself. Using laws from the pre-smartphone era to charge a CEO with crimes committed by third parties on the platform he manages is a misguided approach. Building technology is hard enough as it is. No innovator will ever build new tools if they know they can be personally held responsible for potential abuse of those tools.
Establishing the right balance between privacy and security is not easy. You have to reconcile privacy laws with law enforcement requirements, and local laws with EU laws. You have to take into account technological limitations. As a platform, you want your processes to be consistent globally, while also ensuring they are not abused in countries with weak rule of law. We’ve been committed to engaging with regulators to find the right balance. Yes, we stand by our principles: our experience is shaped by our mission to protect our users in authoritarian regimes. But we’ve always been open to dialogue.
Sometimes we can’t agree with a country’s regulator on the right balance between privacy and security. In those cases, we are ready to leave that country. We’ve done it many times. When Russia demanded we hand over “encryption keys” to enable surveillance, we refused — and Telegram got banned in Russia. When Iran demanded we block channels of peaceful protesters, we refused — and Telegram got banned in Iran. We are prepared to leave markets that aren’t compatible with our principles, because we are not doing this for money. We are driven by the intention to bring good and defend the basic rights of people, particularly in places where these rights are violated.
All of that does not mean Telegram is perfect. Even the fact that authorities could be confused by where to send requests is something that we should improve. But the claims in some media that Telegram is some sort of anarchic paradise are absolutely untrue. We take down millions of harmful posts and channels every day. We publish daily transparency reports (like this or this ). We have direct hotlines with NGOs to process urgent moderation requests faster.
However, we hear voices saying that it’s not enough. Telegram’s abrupt increase in user count to 950M caused growing pains that made it easier for criminals to abuse our platform. That’s why I made it my personal goal to ensure we significantly improve things in this regard. We’ve already started that process internally, and I will share more details on our progress with you very soon.
I hope that the events of August will result in making Telegram — and the social networking industry as a whole — safer and stronger. Thanks again for your love and memes